nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
AI智读

腾云AI智读

以下回复内容均依据本文提供!

AI导读
* 友情提示:该部分内容由 AI技术自动生成,仅供参考。对于因使用本网站以上内容产生的相关后果,本网站不承担任何商业和法律责任。
* 登录仅用于提升体验和增强功能,不会增加额外使用限制。
氮肥处理下不同类型小麦茎秆基部节间转录组差异表达基因的分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300408;2017YFD0301301); 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1408085MC48;1408085QC54)
邮箱(Email): yansh@ahstu.edu.cn;
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-07-03
出版时间: 2026-07-03
网络发布时间: 2026-07-03
移动端阅读
摘要:

为探究氮肥对不同氮敏感型小麦抗倒伏能力形成以及转录组差异基因表达的影响,以氮敏感型小麦YM19和氮不敏感型小麦NM9两个小麦品种为材料,设置施纯氮180 kg/hm2(N1)、240 kg/hm2(N2)两个氮素水平,对开花后7 d小麦茎秆倒二节间进行RNA-seq转录组测序,结合KOG、GO和KEGG数据库进行差异表达基因的功能注释与通路分析。结果表明,氮敏感型品种YM19在N2与N1处理下的差异表达基因数量(2 444个)显著多于对氮不敏感型品种NM9(470个),表明两个品种对氮水平变化的响应存在显著的品种特异性,YM19对氮素更敏感。功能注释与通路分析显示,YM19的差异表达基因涉及17个KOG功能类别,在生物过程、细胞组分、分子功能三大GO分类维度均有大量差异基因富集,且能注释到细胞过程、环境信息处理等4大类共9个KEGG通路,涵盖基因表达调控、碳水化合物运输与代谢、信号转导、能量代谢等关键过程;而NM9的差异表达基因仅涉及4个KOG功能类别,GO分类中差异基因数量远少于YM19,且未注释到任何KEGG通路。研究证实,品种间差异表达基因的数量、功能类别及参与的代谢通路不同,是导致其抗倒性能对氮水平响应存在特异性的核心分子机制,这些差异基因通过调控小麦茎秆的物质代谢、细胞结构和信号转导等过程,参与抗倒性能的形成与维持。本研究为小麦抗倒伏品种的分子育种及田间氮肥精准施用提供了理论依据。

Abstract:

To explore the effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the formation of lodging resistance and the expression of transcriptomic differentially expressed genes(DEGs) in wheat varieties with different nitrogen sensitivities,two wheat varieties,nitrogen-sensitive YM19 and nitrogen-insensitive NM9, were used as experimental materials. Two nitrogen application levels were set,namely 180 kg/hm2(N1) and 240 kg/hm2(N2) of pure nitrogen. RNA-seq transcriptome sequencing was performed on the second internode from the top of wheat stems at 7 days after flowering. Functional annotation and pathway analysis of DEGs were conducted using KOG,GO,and KEGG databases. The results showed that the number of DEGs in the nitrogen-sensitive variety YM19 under N2 compared with N1(2 444)was significantly higher than that in the nitrogen-insensitive variety NM9(470),indicating a significant varietal specificity in the response of the two varieties to changes in nitrogen levels,with YM19 being more sensitive to nitrogen. Functional annotation and pathway analysis revealed that the DEGs of YM19 were involved in 17 KOG functional categories,with a large number of DEGs enriched in the three GO classification dimensions(biological process,cellular component,and molecular function),and could be annotated to nine KEGG pathways belonging to four major categories(cellular processes,environmental information processing,etc.),covering key processes such as gene expression regulation,carbohydrate transport and metabolism,signal transduction,and energy metabolism. In contrast,the DEGs of NM9 were only involved in only four KOG functional categories,the number of DEGs in GO classifications was much lower than that in YM19,and no KEGG pathways were annotated. This study confirmed that differences in the number,functional categories, and involved metabolic pathways of DEGs between varieties are the core molecular mechanisms underlying the specific response of lodging resistance to nitrogen levels. These DEGs participate in the formation and maintenance of lodging resistance by regulating processes such as substance metabolism,cell structure,and signal transduction in wheat stems. This study provides a theoretical basis for the molecular breeding of lodgingresistant wheat varieties and the precise application of nitrogen fertilizer in the field.

参考文献

[1]庞志远,程宇坤,郭小玲,等.水旱条件下小麦分蘖相关性状全基因组关联分析[J].华北农学报,2024,39(6):64-75.

[2]Cai T,Peng D,Wang R,et al. Can intercropping or mixed cropping of two genotypes enhance wheat lodging resistance?[J]. Field Crops Research,2019,239:10-18.

[3]杨阳,赵广才,常旭虹,等.种植密度对冬小麦茎秆形态及抗倒伏能力的调控效应[J].中国农业科学,2024,57(8):1521-1533.

[4]位芳,李豪圣,刘建军,等.小麦茎秆抗倒伏性状的遗传解析与分子育种研究进展[J].作物学报,2024,50(5):1067-1078.

[5]张颖,孟凡超,吴云涛.小麦倒伏对产量品质及生产效益的影响机制研究[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2024,52(2):56-62.

[6]李娟,王宁,张立祯.节水减氮对宁夏引黄灌区春小麦抗倒伏特性及产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2024,42(2):45-52.

[7]王晨阳,郭天财,朱云集,等.不同倒伏程度对冬小麦光合特性及干物质转运分配的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2021,41(8):956-964.

[8]Berry P,Spink J. Predicting yield losses caused by lodging in wheat[J]. Field Crops Research,2012,137:19-26.

[9]李慧敏,邢志鹏,张海鹏,等.化学调控及其他栽培措施在小麦抗倒伏高产栽培中的应用[J].作物学报,2025,51(4):847-862.

[10]傅晓艺,何明琦,赵彦坤,等.长期定位施氮条件下种植密度对冬小麦石4366品质和氮肥利用的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2023,43(2):215-224.

[11]马龙,王书停,史雷,等.有机肥配施氮肥对西北旱地冬小麦产量、品质及土壤生物学特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(10):2718-2724.

[12]王浩,刘娟,方亮.不同施氮量对小麦茎秆形态建成及抗倒性的影响[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(6):32-38.

[13]李燕,王俊忠,张丽华,等.氮肥调控对旱地小麦氮素吸收及抗逆性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(9):1512-1521.

[14]王朝辉,李生秀,王西娜.基于旱地小麦高产优质的氮肥用量优化[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(5):789-798.

[15]牟海萌,孙丽芳,王壮壮,等.施氮量和种植密度对两冬小麦品种抗倒性能和籽粒产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2023,56(15):2863-2879.

[16]张敏,李平,何中虎,等.小麦氮素响应的茎秆转录组差异表达基因分析[J].麦类作物学报,2024,44(04):401-412.

[17]姜存仓,高菊生,彭畅,等.氮肥调控作物茎秆抗倒性的分子机制研究进展[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2024,30(3):401-410.

[18]Zhang X B,Ding Y G,Ma Q,et al. Comparative transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis revealed molecular mechanism of two wheat near-isogenic lines response to nitrogen application[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2023:19547.

[19]魏鹏,张培文,李文阳,等.氮肥对不同类型小麦产量与品质的影响及调控差异[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(5):24-31.

[20]张萌,李汝玉,张晓科,等.小麦氮素响应相关LncRNA的鉴定及调控网络分析[J].麦类作物学报,2024,44(6):641-652.

[21]刘童,夏文君,彭小爱,等.氮肥运筹对小麦籽粒灌浆、花后干物质转运及植株糖含量影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2024,42(4):771-779.

[22]王颖,李勇,周琴,等.小麦茎秆基部节间氮素响应的转录组分析及抗倒候选基因挖掘[J].中国农业科学,2024,57(12):2315-2330.

[23]张雪艳,董召荣,汤玉庚,等.不同氮敏感性小麦品种氮素吸收利用的分子调控差异[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2024,30(8):1297-1308.

[24]李建伟,杨春燕,朱新开,等.小麦碳水化合物代谢基因TaSUS7调控茎秆细胞壁合成与抗倒伏性的机制[J].作物学报,2024,50(9):1856-1867.

[25]赵旭,王晨阳,郭天财,等.冬小麦响应氮素水平变化的共性与特异性分子通路分析[J].麦类作物学报,2024,44(7):789-801.

[26]陈曦,方先文,顾骏飞,等.非编码RNA Ta-miR167a介导小麦氮素响应的分子调控机制[J].中国农业科学,2025,58(2):267-280.

基本信息:

中图分类号:S512.1

引用信息:

[1]魏鹏,陈志英,柏文静,等.氮肥处理下不同类型小麦茎秆基部节间转录组差异表达基因的分析[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版)().

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300408;2017YFD0301301); 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1408085MC48;1408085QC54)

发布时间:

2026-07-03

出版时间:

2026-07-03

网络发布时间:

2026-07-03

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文